Trade Policies and Export Barriers in Afghanistan: Threats and Opportunities on the Path to Trade Development from the
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61438/bsrqj.v2i3.117Keywords:
Trade policies, export barriers, trade development, economic growth, AfghanistanAbstract
This study aims to examine the impact of trade policies, infrastructure, political stability, security concerns, and the economic environment on trade development in Afghanistan. Data were collected through a questionnaire with 31 respondents and analyzed using descriptive statistics and Pearson regression. The results indicate that Afghanistan’s current trade policies generally hinder trade development (r = 0.55, p < 0.01). The transportation and logistics infrastructure are inadequate and inefficient, negatively affecting trade development (r = 0.50, p < 0.02). Political instability and frequent changes in government policies create an insecure and unpredictable business environment, impeding trade development (r = 0.45, p < 0.03). Security concerns and risks along trade routes lead to delays and losses in trade (r = 0.40, p < 0.04). Additionally, the decline in foreign investment and weaknesses in business environment indicators reduce Afghanistan’s competitiveness and trade development (r = 0.48, p < 0.02). The study’s recommendations include revising and improving trade policies, investing in transportation and logistics infrastructure, establishing political stability, enhancing security conditions, attracting foreign investment, and strengthening regional trade cooperation. Implementing these recommendations can help increase exports, attract foreign investment, and ultimately boost the country’s economic growth. This study assists policymakers and decision-makers in focusing on improving these variables to accelerate trade development in Afghanistan and achieve sustainable development.
References
Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2021). Afghanistan: Country operations business plan (2021–2023).
Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2021). Analysis of the state of transportation and logistics infrastructure in Afghanistan and its impact on trade.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. Wiley.
Frank, A. G. (1967). Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America. Monthly Review Press.
Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction. (2019). Quarterly report to the United States Congress.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance matters VIII: Aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996–2008. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4978.
OECD. (2018). Barriers to trade and economic development in Afghanistan.
OECD. (2022). Political instability and its effects on Afghanistan’s economic environment and trade.
Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy and taxation.
Solow, R. (1956). The neoclassical growth theory. Harvard University.
Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the world economy; Suggestions for an international economic policy. Twentieth Century Fund.
United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (2020). Afghanistan: Political instability and its impact on the business environment.
United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (2020). Afghanistan human development report.
United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (2023). Afghanistan economic and trade outlook.
United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (2023). Economic and security situation report on Afghanistan.
World Bank. (2020). Doing business report: Political instability and its impact on Afghanistan's trade.
World Bank. (2022). Afghanistan economic report: Challenges for trade and economic growth.
World Bank. (2022). Doing business report: Political instability and its impact on Afghanistan's trade.
Zadeh, M. A. (2021). Afghanistan’s economy: Challenges and opportunities. Tehran University Press.
