An Analysis of Recent Global Developments in the International Order (2001–2024)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61438/bsrqj.v2i3.118Keywords:
New World Order, Unilateralism, Hegemony, International System, CrisisAbstract
Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the United States emerged as the sole hegemonic power on a global stage, establishing a new world order to consolidate its dominance. However, since the beginning of the 21st century, certain regional actors have expressed dissatisfaction with the unilateralism and hegemony of the United States, seeking alternatives to unipolarity and endeavoring to shape a new order that aligns with their interests. This study aims to analyze the emerging new order shaped by the increasing presence of regional actors. The primary research question is: What significant global developments from 2001 to 2024 have led to the transformation of international order? The author hypothesizes that the dynamism of international events coupled with the strategic actions of major powers necessitates a redefinition of the established order in response to these global shifts. To address this question and examine the hypothesis, this study employs an analytical-explanatory approach, drawing on library resources, scholarly articles, and research journals. The findings indicate that major powers seek to reclaim their pivotal roles in the new global order. Additionally, crises such as the Ukraine war, tensions over Taiwan, and Middle Eastern conflicts signify the decline of the old order and the emergence of a redefined system characterized by new actors and demands.
References
Abdollahi, M. (2018). Fundamental challenges in new world order transition: Post-unilateralism and the rise of China. Foreign Relations, 10(3), 183–202.
Abdollahkhani, A. (2013). Security theories (2nd ed.). International Studies Research Institute.
Ansary Kargar, A. (2023). Explaining the reference of the international community and global society for protests in the international system. Ghalib Scientific-Research Quarterly, 12(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.58342/ghalibqj.V.12.I.3.11
Asadi, A. A. (2010). Realism and competing approaches to foreign policy. Rahbord Quarterly, 19(56), 223–252.
Ajili, H., & Rezaei, N. (2018). Defensive and offensive realism: A theoretical framework for analyzing events in the Persian Gulf region. National Security Quarterly, 8(27), 165–198.
Borovsky, Y. V. (2024). The view of offensive realism and liberalism on U.S. foreign policy. Polis (Russian Federation), 2024(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.01.03
Brown, C., & Ainley, K. (2012). Understanding international relations (M. J. Ranjkesh & F. Salavati Toroghi, Trans.). Marandiz.
Burchill, S., Linklater, A., Devetak, R., & Donnelly, J. (2014). Theories of international relations (H. Moshirzadeh & R. Talebi Arani, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Mizan Legal Foundation.
Dolatshahi, M. A. F. (2014). Russia’s foreign policy during the Putin era. Ghalib Scientific-Research Quarterly, 3(1), 82–97.
Farhadi, F., & Hedayati, M. (2021). The future of the Middle East regional order in the horizon 2030. Defensive Future Studies, 6(22), 37–67. https://doi.org/10.22034/dfsr.2021.138182.1429
Gavam, S. A. (2015). International relations theories and approaches (10th ed.). SAMT.
Griffiths, M. (2023). International theory for the twenty-first century (A. Tayyeb, Trans.). Nashreney.
Griffiths, M., & O’Callaghan, T. (2009). International relations: The key concepts (M. Amjad, Trans.). Mizan Legal Foundation.
Hasanvand, M., & Esfandyari, M. (2019). The new world order and the evolution of new regionalism. Foreign Relations, 10(4), 39–69.
Hosseini, H. (2005). The new world order in the 21st century: Illiberal democracies or liberal democracies in the Middle East and North Africa. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 8(28), 359–377.
Hosseini, E. G., & Khwaja, R. (2013). The realism school and military strategy. Defense Policy Journal, 21(83), 99–124.
Jahanbin, F., & Partow, F. (2015). Future scenarios of the international system. Strategic Policy Research Quarterly, 4(13), 147–168.
Kolayi, E., & Niknam, R. (2014). The strategic challenge of China and the United States over global hegemony. Strategic Policy Research Quarterly, 3(11), 161–182.
Mahmoodikia, M. (2023). Layered analysis of the nature of Iran’s foreign policy challenges in the Middle East's new order (2010–2020). Matin Research Journal, 25(99), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.22034/matin.2023.370864.2112
Mersheimer, J. (2011). The tragedy of great power politics (Q. Cheginizadeh, Trans.; 3rd ed.). Institute for Political and International Studies.
Moshirzadeh, H. (2014). Development in international relations theories (6th ed.). SAMT.
Mousavi Shafaee, M., & Shapouri, M. (2016). The USA and the international system: From a unipolar order to a trans-polar order. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 18(68), 139–165.
Rafi, H., & Jami, M. B. (2013). America’s strategy against China’s economic and political-security influence in Central Asia. Central Asia and the Caucasus Quarterly, 83, 95–104.
Raham, E. (2022). NATO and Ukraine: Lessons and implications. Threat Studies Quarterly, 1(1), 104–129.
Sazmand, B. (2011). Foreign policies of great powers. Tehran International Studies & Research Institute.
Seifzadeh, S. H. (2014). Theory-building in international relations: Fundamentals and paradigms. SAMT.
Shafaee, M. M., & Shapouri, M. (2015). America and the international system. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 18(2), 140–165.
Tzu, S. (2024). The art of war (M. J. Nemati, Trans.). Yushita.
Vasouqi, S., & Kheiri, M. (2016). Ukraine: The field of confrontation between the West and Russia. Central Asia and the Caucasus Quarterly, 94, 134–156.
Yazdani, E., Talai, R. H., & Bahrami, R. (2017). The role of Russia and China in the transition of the international system from unipolar to multipolar. Political Studies Quarterly, 9(36), 60–95.
