A Comparison of Testimony and Expert Opinion in Proving Crimes from the Perspective of Imami Jurisprudence (With Emphasis on Compensation for Hair)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61438/bsrqj.v2i3.126Keywords:
Expert Opinion, Testimony, Imami Jurisprudence, Hair Compensation, Quran, Hadith, ConsensusAbstract
This study aims to examine the jurisprudential nature of "expert opinion" and its distinctions from "testimony" within the framework of Imami jurisprudence, with a particular focus on the subject of hair compensation (diyyat al-shaʿr). This study seeks to elucidate the similarities and differences between these two jurisprudential institutions from the perspective of Imami jurisprudence. It is evident that "expert opinion" and "testimony" share certain formal and substantive similarities, while significant differences also exist between them. In Imami jurisprudence, "expert opinion" refers to consulting individuals with expertise and experience for the purpose of establishing facts and making judicial decisions, whereas "testimony" pertains to the statements of individuals who have directly witnessed the occurrence of a crime. Employing a descriptive-analytical method, this study explored the theoretical foundations and conditions of these two concepts and analyzed their essential differences. Furthermore, jurisprudential evidence for consulting experts, including the Qur'an, traditions (riwayat), consensus (ijma), and the rational practice of the wise (binaʾ al-ʿuqalaʾ), has been comprehensively examined. The findings underscore the importance of accurately distinguishing between these two concepts in judicial processes and appropriately applying them based on the specific circumstances of the cases.
References
Al-Bukhari, M. I. (2008). Sahih al-Bukhari (M. D. Al-Bugha, Ed.). Beirut: Dar Ibn Kathir.
Al-Qaradawi, A. (1995). Al-Munajjid. Tehran: Islam Publishing.
Al-Qurtubi, A. A. M. A. (1993). Al-Jami’ li Ahkam al-Qur'an. Cairo: Dar al-Sha’ab.
Al-San’ani, A. R. A. (1983). Musannaf (H. R. Al-Azami, Ed.). Beirut: Al-Maktab Al-Islami.
Al-Suhimi, H. B. M. (2007). The role of expertise in criminal cases under Saudi criminal procedure law: An analytical study. Jeddah: Naif Arab University for Security Sciences.
Al-Zuhaili, W. (1998). Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuh (Islamic Jurisprudence and Its Proofs). Damascus: Dar al-Fikr.
Ansari, S. M. (2007). Fara’id al-Usul. Qom: Majma’ al-Fikr al-Islami.
Balaghat, M. Y. (2008). The authority of expert opinion in criminal matters: A legal-jurisprudential study. Ma’refat Journal, 134.
Bakhshi Mehrbani, M., Ghorusi, N., & Jahangiri, S. (2020). Exploring the concept of expertise in Islamic thought. Jurisprudential and Philosophical Studies, 11(43), 2–20.
Bamini, M. A., & Rezaei, M. (2023). The role of Islamic law experts in administrative justice. Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence and Foundations of Law, 16(2), 39–55.
Bukhari, M. H. (2008). Sahih Muslim (M. F. Abdul-Baqi, Ed.). Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi.
Ebn Manzoor, M. (n.d.). Lisan al-Arab. Beirut: Dar al-Maarif.
Fadaei Mehrbani, M., Gorusi, N., & Jahangiri, S. (2020). Exploring the concept of expertise in Islamic jurisprudence. Jurisprudential and Philosophical Studies, 11(43), 2–20.
Habibi, M., & Atrian, F. (2023). The role of experts in Islamic law in achieving administrative justice. Journal of Jurisprudence and Islamic Foundations of Law, 16(2), 39–55.
Hassan Zadeh, M. (2005). The relationship between expertise and testimony in jurisprudence and law. Journal of Jurisprudence and Law, 1(1), 71–83.
Khosravi, M. R. (2008). Expertise and linguistics. Expert Journal, 22.
Makarem Shirazi, N. (1995). Anwar al-Usul (A. Ghodsi, Ed.). Qom: Nasl-e Javan Publishing.
Najafi, M. H. (1983). Jawahir al-Kalam. Tehran: Dar al-Kutub al-Islami.
Nakounam, M. R. (2011). The height of Shia jurisprudence: Comparative studies of two Shia jurisprudential thoughts. Islamshahr: Sobh-e Farda Publishing.
Porseyd, B., & Keykha Farzaneh, M. A. (2012). The validity of expert opinions in Imami and Sunni jurisprudence: A comparative study in Arab countries. Islamic Law Research Journal, 13(35), 125–156.
Setoudeh, H. (2016). The credibility of forensic medical opinions in judicial rulings. Ahl al-Bayt Jurisprudence Journal, 87, 26–56.
Shamloo, A. (2004). The height of Shi’a jurisprudence: Comparative studies in jurisprudential thought. Tehran: Sobh-e Farda Publishing.
Tofiq, A. (n.d.). Means of proof in Moroccan legislation. Morocco: Dar al-Qanun.
